tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8777450927784273231.post2077573709319227600..comments2023-10-24T02:38:38.935-07:00Comments on The Classic Match: 1992 US Open SF: Edberg def. ChangUsirnaymhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01628484939827865502noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8777450927784273231.post-78408204063115305482011-06-11T11:30:52.929-07:002011-06-11T11:30:52.929-07:00In my opinion this match was not THAT bad. For ins...In my opinion this match was not THAT bad. For instance, if you look at the stats you will find out that Edberg had "only" 67 unforced errors, which is not too much for a long five-set match that took 5 1/2 hours! Chang had about 40 UE. What also is remarkable: Edberg has been to the net 254 times in this match!! You will not find any numbers like these in today's tennis...There have also been some great shots during this match. But all in all I agree that it was a somewhat strange match with so many ups and downs. With exciting moments, but also very poor moments.tennisfanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02282931351153642777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8777450927784273231.post-5298019242652220952011-05-19T21:08:29.460-07:002011-05-19T21:08:29.460-07:00I definitely remember this match and you are corre...I definitely remember this match and you are correct. If you ever watch how the Russian women crack on their serve when they are up a break in the final set, Chang was exactly that. If he had just serve accurately to Edberg's error prone forehand, the match was Chang's. He was the Elena Dementieva of men's tennis.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12243599943897207887noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8777450927784273231.post-18584654370626781332009-08-27T10:09:08.337-07:002009-08-27T10:09:08.337-07:00Justed wanted to say that you did a great job on t...Justed wanted to say that you did a great job on the blog. I like it.Stefan Vasilevhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09471915400881476158noreply@blogger.com